However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 15, 2014, at around 02:10, the Defendant driven a C-II cargo vehicle without obtaining a driver's license from approximately 2.5 meters section from the 12-9-9 jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning CCTV photographs for crime prevention, the ledger of driver's licenses, disqualified meetings of the main office, and the revocation of driver's licenses;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of penalty, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including probation, community service, and order to attend a lecture, even if the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine twice for the same kind of crime and has been sentenced to a punishment for imprisonment again, and the Defendant was found to have committed the instant crime because of the fact that the Defendant was found to have committed the instant crime and the driver’s license was revoked on or around January 2014. Considering the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime, the Defendant would not repeat again, and that there was a family member to support the Defendant, and other circumstances that are the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, family environment, means of the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence shall be