2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is an individual entrepreneur engaged in the business of manufacturing the species of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant.

B. From that point of time, the Plaintiff traded to F (hereinafter “F”) the individual entrepreneur’s spouse, Defendant C (hereinafter “F”) in four times from August 2014 to October, 201, supplied compressed species. The Plaintiff issued a tax invoice of KRW 144,461,240 (including value-added tax) in total as the recipient of F’s Defendant C.

C. Defendant C, on October 21, 2014 and November 26, 2014, issued by G Co., Ltd., the business partner, and each electronic bill of exchange KRW 58,000,000, and KRW 100,000,000, respectively, designated the endorsee as the Plaintiff and endorsed the endorsee as the Plaintiff, thereby allowing the Plaintiff to settle the amount of the bill.

Defendant C and F by the Plaintiff

B. At the time of commencement of the entry transaction, the Plaintiff had not been paid for the goods from E Company.

E Co., Ltd. closed its business around 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 5, and Eul evidence 8 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1: (a) from around 2012 to around October 2012, Defendant B traded with the Plaintiff to supply compressed species through E Co., Ltd.; (b) established F in the name of the Defendant C, the spouse of the Plaintiff, who is the spouse of the Plaintiff, and continued to engage in goods transaction with the Plaintiff; and (c) intentionally discontinued the transaction with the Plaintiff. The Defendants, while running the E Co., Ltd. and F together, were supplied with the compressed species of KRW 14,461,240 in total in the name of F from August 2014 to October 200 when the price of goods that the E Co., Ltd. did not pay to the Plaintiff remains at least KRW 100 million. The Defendants thereafter, 158,000.