However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On July 19, 2016, around 00:23 on July 19, 2016, the Defendant assaulted a third village with drinking alcohol at the frontway of the members of Changwon-si, Changwon-si.

“Absing to ask questions concerning the circumstances of the instant case by police officers D belonging to the police station C of the Mapo-dong Police Station of Msan, which was called upon 112 report,” and called “Absing to this Chewing, not yet known.”

Chewing typhos, phosh, phosh.

“In doing so, at the same time, assaulted the parts of the D’s bridge one time to walk with each other’s hand, such as breaking the shoulder.

The Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the prevention, suppression, investigation, and maintenance of order of crimes as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made to D or E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Attachment to the 112 Report List);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] that there is no person [the person subject to a special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and four months] (the decision of the sentenced sentence] [the person subject to a special sentencing] 6 months of imprisonment, the suspended sentence 2 years (the fact that one's mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no past record of the suspended sentence or higher, the two years of suspended sentence, and the crime that interferes with the execution of official duties will not be re-offending again.

(3) such consideration as the