beta
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.10.05 2020고단809

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million as a fine for the violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. in the Daejeon District Court's branch court on June 18, 2010, and KRW 3.5 million as a fine for the same crime in the same court on May 14, 2012.

On February 21, 2020, at around 21:35, the Defendant driven a BN-si car within a approximately 7km distance from the commercial area in the Seo-gu, Seoan-dong, Seoan-dong to the long distance from the two stations in the same Dong-dong, Seoan-gu, Seoan-si, Seoul, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.03% of blood alcohol level.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the control of drinking driving and report on the control of drinking driving;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of sound driving records);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two years but not more than five years;

2. Not applying the sentencing criteria: The sentencing criteria are not yet prepared for the crimes of violating the Road Traffic Act;

3. The decision-making driving of a sentence is a crime which may bring the life of a person as well as his own, and is highly dangerous.

The defendant is punished due to drinking driving as stated in the ruling, but he is re-driving, and his liability for such crime is not easy.

However, the defendant seems to have led to confession and reflect on the crime of this case.

Finally, a considerable period of time has passed since 2012 for the last punishment for drinking driving.

There is no power of punishment heavier than a fine.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background leading to the crime, method and attitude of the crime, circumstances before and after the crime, etc. are considered.