However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 31, 2014, around 21:20 on May 31, 2014, the Defendant used plastic bars (the total length: 35cm, 3.5cm) and excessive (the total length: 20cm, 10cm: 10cm: 10cm) to put the victim D (the 15-year-old age) into a fluorcing victim E (the 15-year-old age-). The Defendant stated that “the fluor is the same as the fluor of a large number of withdrawals,” and that “the fluor of a large number of withdrawals,” which are dangerous articles in his house.

After the defendant threatened the victim D with excessive treatment under the item of the victim D, the defendant took the victim's face at one time with plastic sealing, and led the victim D to the face of the victim for about two weeks of treatment.

Since then, the defendant went to go to the F convenience store near his wife.

In addition to the victim E, the head of the victim E was satisfying with plastic straw and drinking, and the victim continued to satisfying for approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police protocol of statement about D, E, and G;

1. Plastics and plastic wing photographs;

1. Photographs of each damaged part;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing the video;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 53 or 55 (1) 3);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that all victims have agreed to suspend execution);

1. The defendant's defense counsel's assertion about the defendant's defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (including a majority of criminal records of violence) is that at the time of the crime of this case, the defendant was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder under the influence of alcohol.