공무집행방해
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.
Punishment of the crime
On April 28, 2015, around 20:23, the Defendant: (a) expressed his desire to “Ado police officer,” “I would like to interfere with his behavior and to return home,” and assault E’s face on one occasion by hand, and continue to interfere with E’s face at one time by hand.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement to E by the police;
1. A written statement;
1. Application of documentary evidence image Acts and subordinate statutes at the time of arrest;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [decision of the sentence] The sentence of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of the recommended area] the basic area of the [decision of the obstruction of performance of official duties/performance of duties] (decision of the recommended area] - Whether or not the suspension of execution is suspended or not] - The reasons for general reference: Criminal records of the suspension of execution (decision of the sentence] 6 months, and two years