2. The decision-making Defendants are divided into their mistakes, Defendant A is an initial criminal with no criminal history, and Defendant B has no criminal history other than a single fine.

However, in the case of Defendant A, Defendant B instigated Defendant B to give perjury, and Defendant B made a false statement as a witness who has taken an oath under the law in the case of Defendant B, and the nature of the crime is not very good. Considering the Defendants’ age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendants’ above assertion is groundless.

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendants' appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.