However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, together with C and D, received a loan from Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. in the name of D, even though he did not intend or have the ability to repay the loan, and applied for a vehicle purchase loan to the victim company with the accident loan of KRW 689,113 per month in the name of D for 48 months, and conspired to distribute the purchase price after selling the vehicle with the relevant loan in the middle of the large-lane.

Around October 8, 2012, the Defendant, C, and D applied for a loan of vehicle purchase funds to the employees in charge of the victim company in the name of Gland F agency in the Gland in the name of Gland F agency in the Seo-gu Seoul-gu, Gwangju, for a loan of KRW 29,40,000 from the employees in charge.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the suspect examination protocol of the prosecution against C and the protocol of statement of D to the prosecution;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the nature of the crime and the circumstances of the crime cannot be deemed to be light in that the criminal was led to the criminal conduct; however, considering the fact that the criminal defendant all recognized the crime and appears against this law, that the criminal defendant has no specific criminal power other than the one fine power,

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;