beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.08.25 2014고정2083

재물손괴등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00, at D main points operated by the Victim C in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul; (b) while drinking alcohol together with E, the Defendant: (c) sold cosmetics equivalent to three million won to the victim; and (d) the victim doubtfuled the victim with the main body of CCTV and monitoring line, which was on the knickter, with suspicion of the two defects that he gifted the cosmetic, and divided into drinking and drinking and down drinking, etc.; (c) marged the soft computers at the bar; (d) marged three metal tanks on the knickter; and (e) marged the knick line on the knter.

In this regard, the Defendant destroyed one set of Nowon-gu computers equivalent to KRW 2,49,000, 300, 300,000, and 3 metal sculptures, the market price of which is unknown, and damaged the CCTV principal body and monitors to cover KRW 1,20,000.

2. The Defendant, as set forth in Paragraph 1, was able to see the victim’s head flag, flaged the victim’s head flag, flaged the victim’s face, flaged the victim’s head flag, flaged the victim’s head flag, flaged the victim’s head flag, flaged the victim’s head.

In this regard, the above victim suffered bodily injury such as salt ties, tensions, etc., which require approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning C and E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. On-site photographs and victim photographs;

1. Application of C’s written statement (Investigation Record 49 pages) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 366 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and reflects the depth thereof.