2. The judgment of the defendant is a favorable condition to the defendant for the following reasons: (a) the defendant made a confession of the crime of this case and has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime.

However, perjury requires strict punishment for a crime that obstructs the proper exercise of judgment authority, which is the judicial action of the State, and the discovery of substantial truth, and the defendant's perjury seems to have an impact on F's sentencing, and the defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court on March 24, 2011, and committed the instant crime on September 23, 201 after the execution of the sentence was completed, and the defendant was committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period, and in full view of various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and consequence, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.