When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 23, 2014, around 04:37, the Defendant: (a) taken a C-si driven by the victim B in a way that it is difficult to identify the original rice-dong area in Ansan-si; and (b) called, “C-si, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, to c-si, to c-si.m.” to the victim.

However, the fact is that the victim did not intend to pay the taxi fee even if the victim was born to the destination by driving the taxi.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim and allowing the victim to operate a taxi at the same place in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City to operate the taxi, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to KRW 57,160 of the taxi fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement No. B

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;