2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3.Paragraph 1.

A. On April 27, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant for approximately two years from May 31, 2016 to May 30, 2018 (the “mortgage lease agreement” hereinafter) with respect to Asan City C apartment D (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. The Plaintiff paid all KRW 270,000,000 to the Defendant the instant lease deposit.

C. From March 1, 2018, prior to the expiration of the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the fact that there was no intent to renew the instant lease agreement from March 1, 2018 to the Defendant by means of text notes, content certificates, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the conclusion of the instant lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant; (b) the Plaintiff paid all the deposit for the lease of this case; and (c) the fact that the term of the instant lease agreement expires, as seen earlier, that the instant lease agreement was terminated upon the expiration of the term.

Therefore, the lessor is obligated to return the lease deposit amount of KRW 270,000,00 to the Plaintiff as the lessee.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and all of them are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.