난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
In the first instance judgment, the first instance judgment No. 4, 5 (E) added the following contents to “D” Nos. 4, 9 of the first instance judgment, and then, the Plaintiff asserts that: (a) while the subject of gambling against refugees is not limited to the State; and (b) D is a member of the house office located in Kamera, it should be deemed as a ground for recognition of refugee status.
However, even if D has the status of a member of the National Assembly in the Republic of Korea, it cannot be said that the threat by refusal of his personal request can be naturally considered as a refugee.
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.