However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, at around 03:50 on August 1, 2020, was in front of a singing room located in the Jindo-si, Jindo-si, who was reported on August 1, 2020, 112, and called “one male person enjoy” and sent out by the police officers such as C, etc., of the Jindo-gu Police Station B Worlds, without any other reason, set the part of the patrol car’s beams to the police officer’s hand without any reason, and “I kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn

C. Sheba flicker flock

“At the same time,” she took a bath, carried the chest of the above patrolman C in her hand, and continued to commit violence by cutting the body of the cream D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the defendant's legal statement D, photographs of the police statement protocol against C, and the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the handling of reported cases in 112;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor as provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (the fact that there is no heavy electricity and the fact that there is a reflect on wrongness);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the ground that an order to attend a lecture is more than 62-2 of the Criminal Act (in order to prevent recidivism);