However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00, around the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 101 Dong 204, the Defendant placed the victim with mental retardation 3 in the residence of the victim C (the 51-year old), who was in a congested with the Defendant, on the left side of each side of the victim when the victim’s buckbucks were able to take the bucks without hearing his/her horses.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Reports on internal investigation (Submission of a written diagnosis of injury to a victim) - The written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution is decided as ordered by the Supreme Court Decision on the following grounds: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Procedure (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act) (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Procedure (Article 62(1) of the same Act on the grounds that the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime in question, conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act and the scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee shall be selected by comprehensively taking into account the following factors: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive and consequence of the crime in question; the degree of injury appears