However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On August 8, 2014, at around 00:15, the Defendant: (a) sent to the site a 1112 report on the king 20-ro 11, Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu Seoul, on the road; and (b) sent back to the D police box voluntarily while driving the relevant persons; and (c) sent the back 2-3 free will of the front seat of the above police vehicle on the ground that the police boat F, etc. was taken out on the back wheels of the police vehicle boarding, etc.; and (d) sent the back 2-3-3 free will of the back seat of the police vehicle on the ground that he was taken out on the back wheel of the police vehicle boarding, etc.; and (e) sent the E who was lowered from the police vehicle at the police vehicle, the Defendant expressed that the police she “I am Doz.,” and assaulted the E’s chest by hand, such as smugglinging it.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report handling.

2. The Defendant: (a) laid down at the police vehicle at the above time and place; and (b) took the bath to “Ippp. C. C. C. C. C.C.P.” on his hand, the Defendant assaulted F’s chest and left arms on his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G, E, and F;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of criminal facts: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: The sentencing of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act: The basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties ( June to April); and