A. Defendant A’s real estate listed in attached list No. 1

B. Defendant B shall set out in attached list No. 2.

A. The Plaintiff concluded each of the lease agreements with Defendant A, B, and deceased F as indicated in the following table (hereinafter “each of the lease agreements of this case”) and delivered the leased object to the Defendants around that time.

On November 29, 2017, 168,000 of the real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 264,340 27 August 2015, 2015, listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 of the Defendant A, on August 27, 2015, as of August 27, 2015, the monthly rent for the object of the lessee (won) on the date of concluding the contract.

B. The Plaintiff and the above lessee agreed to allow the Plaintiff to terminate the lease agreement in the instant lease agreement if the lessee fails to pay a monthly rent for at least three consecutive years.

C. On the other hand, on October 24, 2017, F succeeded to F, following the death of Defendant C and D.

By July 30, 2018, the above lessees delayed to pay the rent as indicated in the following table:

Defendant C, D 10 1,759,870 who succeeded to Defendant A 92,194,160 292,798,280 3 networkF in arrears (won)

E. On August 14, 2018, the complaint of this case, on which the Plaintiff expressed the intent to terminate each of the instant lease agreements on the grounds of delinquency in rent, reached Defendant A on September 17, 2018, Defendant C on November 5, 2018, and Defendant B on December 6, 2018, respectively.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry in Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including each number), the facts which are obvious in the record, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts established prior to the determination as to the cause of the claim, since each of the instant lease agreements was lawfully terminated due to the Defendants’ nonperformance, Defendant A is obligated to deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and Defendant B, Defendant C, and D’s real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is with merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.