2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On December 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) against the Plaintiff, a patentee, the Intellectual Property Tribunal; (b) on December 23, 2013, claims 1 and 10 of the instant patent invention are identical substantially to the preceding invention 1 and 2; (c) newness is denied; and (d) from the preceding invention, a person with ordinary knowledge in the art to which the invention pertains (hereinafter “ordinary technician”).

2) On June 30, 2014, the Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal rendered the instant trial ruling accepting the Defendant’s claim for invalidation trial on the grounds that the nonobviousness of the instant patent invention is denied by prior inventions 1 or is denied by prior inventions 1 and 2. (2) The Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal rendered the instant trial ruling accepting the Defendant’s claim for invalidation trial on the grounds that the nonobviousness of the instant patent invention 1 is denied by prior inventions 1 or by prior inventions 1 and 2.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, purport of whole pleadings

B. The Plaintiff’s title of the instant patent invention (Evidence 3) 1: The filing date/registration date/registration number of an electronic document using the original certification mark and scard technology; 2) the filing date/registration date/registration number of the electronic document using the original certification mark and scard technology: the summary of the invention on December 14, 2009 // 14/10 / 100 / 5] the time of the identification of the stamp stamp according to the invention / [5] The instant patent invention pertains to the time of verification of the electronic document and the authenticity of the electronic document (technology]. In the past, in cases where the expansion of the electronic document is added to the original electronic document, there was a change of the expansion of the electronic document or a separate file that manages information of the stamp stamp as a separate file. In particular, in order to peruse the stamp stamp if the expansion of the electronic document is changed, a separate interview (such as a program) should be used.

In this case.