However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 10:00 on August 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) instructed that “Ccafeteria” in front of the “Ccafeteria” located in Ansan-si, the Defendant sent a report that the Defendant she gets to walk and wrap; (b) the police box affiliated with the Ansan-gu, Police Station D police box of the Ansan-gu, Police Station, which called “I am to come to kn's own roadway, and I am to come to kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's k's k.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing damaged parts, on-site video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act shall be taken into consideration the facts