beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.08.21 2014가단16707

약정금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff, on April 28, 2010, lent the above money to the Defendant by receiving a request from the Defendant, who was a son on April 28, 2010, “If the Defendant first pays the purchase price of KRW 174m2 and KRW 68,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0

On April 28, 2010, the fact that the Plaintiff paid 68 million won to C the Defendant’s obligation to purchase real estate on behalf of the Defendant is no dispute between the parties.

However, as shown in the plaintiff's above argument that the plaintiff lent 68 million won to the defendant, it is difficult to believe that the statement of Gap evidence Nos. 5 is stated in Gap's evidence Nos. 3, 4, 6, and 7 (including each number), and it is not sufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

(O) According to the statement No. 6-2 of the evidence No. 6-2, the plaintiff appears to have donated the above amount to the defendant who is the plaintiff, who is the plaintiff). 2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.