beta
서울북부지방법원 2015.01.30 2014고정1553

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is between the Defendant and the victim with knowledge of the golf gathering called “E” as a member.

On March 11, 2014, between 09:24 and 09:32 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) at the home of the Defendant, Seongbuk-gu Seoul F building 906 dong 2601, and the victim and money, and (b) when there is a dispute between the victim and the money, 20 members of the above “E” access to the “E” grouping of the NAV Roster, which is used by the members of the above “E,” and (c) opened several emergency notices of the members. D is expected to be arrested in Japan, which is changing from international professional fraud, and in any future, it should not be able to have his her her her femble. It is apparent that the above 7th anniversary of the emergency arrest was changed to a specialized fraud, and that there is no further agreement between the Defendant and his her fembolite and his fembolite that he/she would not be able to read it.

However, in fact, the victims did not change the international professional fraud, and there was no plan of emergency arrest in Japan, and there was no statement that there was no possibility of opening the bankbook of avoidance and borrowing it to South Korea.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

2. The judgment of this case.