beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2015.03.24 2014고단493

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

The defendant is the applicant for compensation of 30,000,000 won and the applicant for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 493"

1. The Defendant, on June 2009, received KRW 30 million as the down payment from the victim, upon the request of the victim to purchase the land in Q in the vicinity of Jung-Eup, Jung-up, the victim owned by the victim, from the Han-dong Pharma, from the Pharma, which was operated by the victim N in Pharma (O) in order to request the victim to purchase the land.

While the Defendant kept the above money for the victim, he embezzled the money for personal use at will around that time.

2. The Defendant, in January 2009, told the victim R to the effect that “the victim would have his/her daughter appointed as a teacher. At its expense, the Defendant would request the victim R to pay money by entering the 70 million Korean Won.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, he did not have the ability to appoint his wife as a teacher even if he received money from the victim, because he thought that he will use it for urgent personal expenses and repayment of debts.

As such, the Defendant deceiving the victim and transferred KRW 20 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative head of the Tong (S) under the name of the Defendant, around March 25, 2009, from March 25, 2009.

7. Around 27.27.5 million won was transferred to the above agricultural bank passbook and acquired it by fraud.

3. Around April 5, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim T was permitted to collect earth and stones from the victim (Y)V office operated by the victim T in Masan-gu, U.S., Jeon-gu, Jeonbuk-si. The defendant stated to the effect that the contract was defective in terms of KRW 320,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for the collection of these soil and stones.

However, at the time, the Defendant did not have any particular property, and the purchase price of the above WW land was loaned from others, and due to the situation in which X was in the same business relationship with X, it was impossible to enable the victim to collect earth and stones from the above W WW land.

As above, the Defendant.