A. The Defendant Sambu Co., Ltd. issued and delivered the Promissory Notes in Chapter Four (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Promissory Notes”) as indicated in the table below. The Defendant Co., Ltd.’s Cheongbu Co., Ltd.’s Cheongbu Co., Ltd.’s Cheongbu Co., Ltd.’s Cheongbu Co., Ltd.’s Cheong River Construction and Seobu General Construction Co., Ltd.’

The Plaintiff’s payment place at the issue date of the Nos. 190,983,50 on October 1, 2013, 190, 983, 500 on the date when the Plaintiff’s payment was presented at the issue date of the No. 1283, Oct. 31, 2014; and on February 28, 2014, the No. 1287, 450,000 on Oct. 1, 2013, 2013, the No. 25323, 323, 400 on Feb. 3, 2013, the No. 1283, Mar. 31, 2014;

B. The Plaintiff was refused to pay the Promissory Notes in this case at the place of payment presentation as indicated in the above table on the date of payment presentation, on the ground that the payment was conducted in full.

[Ground for recognition] and 3rd Land Co., Ltd.: In the absence of dispute, the entries in Gap evidence 1-1, 2, and 4, the overall purport of pleadings, the construction of Cheong River by the defendant limited company, and the comprehensive construction of library mining by the limited company: Confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. Reviewing the facts of the determination on the cause of the claim, barring any special circumstance, the case is the issuer of the Promissory Notes in question, and the Cheong River Construction and the Cheongbu Construction Co., Ltd. and the Cheongbu Construction Co., Ltd. is the Plaintiff, a holder of the Promissory Notes in combination, who is the holder of the Promissory Notes in question, together with the total face value of KRW 731,756,90 and KRW 190,983,50,000, which is the due date, for KRW 287,450,00 from January 31, 2014; from February 28, 2014; from March 31, 2014; from March 31, 2014, for KRW 253,323,400, each Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd., each of the Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd., from September 19, 2014;