When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[2016 High 960] The defendant is between the victim C (n, 54 years of age) and the victim, and the victim is a person who has entered a private letter to work.

On December 27, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s save and saves business by force, such as making soup soup, at the “E soup, soup,” the Defendant, working for the injured party on the first floor above D 1, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, without any justifiable reasons. On the other hand, the Defendant continued to pay money and entered a soup, and going through a soup, and talks with female customers.

[2016 High 961] On January 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol at around 19:34, the Defendant was unable to sell an over-20 minute 20 minutes of the disturbance, such as being placed on the floor, lying the disturbance on the floor, and putting the things on the customer’s bath; and (b) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 19:34, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's over-sale business by force.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 High Court Decision 960]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of C and I;

1. Each on-site photograph (2016 Go fixed 961);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (Selection of a punishment penalty);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;