beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2018.12.07 2016가합10345

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendants jointly share 42,219,495 won, Plaintiff C, D, E, and F, respectively, and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) Plaintiff B (hereinafter “the deceased”)

Plaintiff C, D, E, and F are the deceased’s children. (2) Defendant G is a person who operates the Gyeong-gun’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s Ha’s

3) On March 18, 2016, the Deceased visited the instant maintenance facility on or around 12:30 on March 18, 2016 and visited Defendant H to one ton of his freight truck (hereinafter “instant truck”).

(4) Defendant H driven the instant truck and laid it off from the instant truck. Defendant H laid the instant truck on a set of three set of liftss located in the instant maintenance shop, and then string off the truck in the vicinity of the driver’s seat, thereby increasing the number of sets by string off the string.

그러던 중 피고 H가 서 있던 위치의 대각선 반대편인 이 사건 트럭 조수석 뒤쪽에서 ‘쿵’하는 소리가 크게 들려 피고 H가 리프트를 정지한 후 소리가 나는 쪽으로 가보니 망인이 쓰러져 있었다

(5) At the time of the instant accident, H’s upper half of the body of the deceased (referring to a spath or spathy) increased. While the back door of the instant truck was opened, the Deceased’s pocket book appears to have been located on the side of the deceased’s bridge, it was far away from the floor. Moreover, on the day of the instant accident, the rain and the floor of the maintenance center of the instant truck were cut down, and there was no indication of the prohibition of access and risk in the event of the instant truck. 6) The Deceased died on June 8, 2018, while receiving medical treatment due to the instant accident.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 8 through 10, 14, 17 (including each number), and