beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.04.14 2017고단667

제주특별자치도설치및국제자유도시조성을위한특별법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendants are foreigners of the nationality of the People's Republic of China.

1. No foreigner who enters the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province without visa to comply with the Special Act on the Establishment of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province and the Development of Free International City shall move to any other area of the Republic of Korea;

The defendant, at the end of 2014, may enter Jeju-do for tourism purposes, from the entry and departure hub of the name in which he/she resides in Jeju-do at the end of the end of 2014 (one name: D) to the name in which he/she resides in Jeju-do.

“Embling the fact,” having known of the fact, entered the country with no certificate of transit for tourism, and had been willing to be employed while traveling to other areas than Jeju-do for a long time.

Accordingly, on March 30, 2015, the Defendant entered Jeju Special Self-Governing Province without a visa into the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province for sojourn B-2 (tourism and transit purpose), and on April 5, 2015, entered the port located in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province for Jeju Special Self-Governing Province for the purpose of staying 30 days, and moved the port to a non-designated farm on April 5, 2015 after having arrived at the non-designated inland land of the Republic of Korea by hiding the unclaimed cargo vehicle onto the unclaimed cargo vehicle on the non-designated inland land of the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the defendant moved to another area of the Republic of Korea without obtaining permission for extension of sojourn area.

2. No foreigner violating the Immigration Control Act shall stay in the Republic of Korea after exceeding the qualifications of his/her body category and the scope of his/her sojourn period;

On April 29, 2015 to February 28, 2017, the Defendant entered Jeju-do in the same manner as above, and stayed in the Republic of Korea, such as Changwon, Marin, Yangsan, Yangsan, and Kim Sea, for which the period of stay expires.

Accordingly, the defendant was staying in the Republic of Korea beyond the scope of the status and the period of stay.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article relevant to facts constituting an offense and the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province which seeks to choose punishment;