교통사고처리특례법위반
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a e-car for the e-car for the e-car.
On May 23, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 17:35 on May 23, 2012, and proceeded along three lanes from the two-lane side of Pyeongtaek-si to the two-lane side of the Home Pluter in front of the Home Pluter in Pyeongtaek-si.
At the same time, there was a crosswalk in which signal lights are installed, and in such cases, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to check whether there is a person driving the motor vehicle, who is engaged in driving the motor vehicle, and to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the traffic signal and prevent the accident in advance.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim C (the age of 84) who was unable to complete the crossing even though the pedestrian signal was changed to the right-hand side of the crosswalk while crossing the crosswalk according to the pedestrian signal on the left-hand side and the pedestrian signal was changed to the pedestrian signal, and caused the victim to go beyond the ground by shocking the right-hand side and knee and scar of the victim to the front side of the vehicle driving by failing to discover the victim C (the age of 84).
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by negligence of the above business, such as rings and rings, which need to be treated for about 14 weeks.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement made to D or C;
1. A medical certificate;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs of traffic accidents;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal
1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a case where the defendant, while driving on the road, brought an injury to the victim by shocking the victim during the crosswalk, and the criminal liability is not weak in light of the result of the crime, such as the degree of injury to the victim, etc.