사문서위조등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
. The phrase “C”, “E”, “F”, and “F”, respectively, are written in the address “Seoul Gangdong-gu** road** road** road**** floor********), and “C indictment” in the signature column of the written consent regarding the provision of personal (credit) information and the provision of use. However, the phrase “C indictment” appears to be a clerical error of “C”, while the phrase “C” appears to be a clerical error.
The signature was signed after stating “.....”
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged 20 copies of the written consent on the application for entry, personal (credit) information inquiry, and provision for use under the name of C, which is a private document related to rights and obligations without authority, from the time to October 8, 2014, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, including forging the written consent on the application for entry, personal (credit) information, and provision for use.
B. The Defendant stated “G”, resident registration number “H”, “H”, “****************************), and contact number “I” in the date and time set forth in paragraph (a) and at the place set forth in paragraph (2) of this Article, and written in the name of “C”, “E”, “F”, and “F”, respectively, in the name of the mandator ** road********, and respectively.
Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a written oath under the name of G and B, a private document on rights and obligations without authority, and forged ten copies of a written pledge as shown in the attached crime list from October 8, 2014 to October 8, 2014.
2. The Defendant at the time and at the place specified in paragraph (a) of Article 1, the written consent on the application for entry, personal (credit) information inquiry, and provision of use of the forged mobile phone at the same time and place, and the written consent on the B’s agent’s pledge as if the written consent was duly formed, from October 8, 2014, the Defendant filed an application for entry of a forged mobile phone from that time to that of October 8, 2014.