상표법위반등
[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year
160 telephones (No. 4), 160 telephones (No. 4), seized by the Defendant.
Punishment of the crime
"2016 Highest 803"
1. No person who commits a joint crime by a defendant A or C shall use a trademark identical with another person's registered trademark on goods similar to the designated goods, or any trademark similar to another person's registered trademark on goods identical with or similar to the designated goods;
From March 2015 to April 201 of the same year, the above Defendants sold 585 points to L (K, a mobile phone dealer, repair company, etc.) with a forged trademark identical or similar to Aphones (registration No. 45-029798 to the Korean Intellectual Property Office), which is the designated goods of the victim J, indicated that the forged Aphones are identical or similar to Aphones (registration No. 45-029798).
Accordingly, the above defendants conspired to infringe on the trademark right of the victim.
2. No person shall use a trademark identical to another person's registered trademark for goods similar to the designated goods or use a trademark similar to another person's registered trademark on goods similar to the designated goods, or use such trademark for goods identical with or similar to the designated goods;
The aforementioned Defendants from August 11, 2015 to the same year.
9. From the time of 24.2, at the above office, the victim J sold as shown in the list of crimes No. 1, a forged 415 points, on which the victim J’s designated goods are identical with or similar to the opon camera 415 points, and a sales amount of KRW 23.5 million (the opon is not an individual part in domestic distribution, and the price calculation of the opon part is difficult), as indicated in the list of crimes No. 1.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to infringe on the trademark right of the victim.
3. No one shall possess for the purpose of transferring or delivering goods identical with or similar to the designated goods on which another person’s registered trademark or any similar trademark is marked.
Defendants from January 2016 to the same year
2. by the time of January 2, 200, the above-mentioned trademark is identical or similar to the i-phone click, the designated goods of the victim J, with or without the i-phone click.