beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.14 2012고단6391

부정경쟁방지및영업비밀보호에관한법률위반(영업비밀누설등)등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,00 and by a fine of KRW 5,00,000, respectively.

Defendant

A and B shall be subject to the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On August 24, 2006, after establishing K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim Co., Ltd.”) that operates the development, manufacture, and sale of software with the victim J, a person who established C Co., Ltd that operates the online game and other software development business on July 16, 2008 after withdrawing the victim Co., Ltd. from the office, and Defendant B works as the head of the planning team of the above victim Co., Ltd from March 12, 2008 and retired on June 25, 2008.

A person is prohibited from acquiring, using, or divulging trade secrets useful to the company for the purpose of acquiring unjust profits or causing damage to the company to a third party, in violation of his/her duties. Defendant A, on June 1, 2008, ordered employees including Defendant B, including Defendant B, etc. to leave all materials before June 1, 2008, left on the victim company’s computer and back all materials after June 1, 2008. At that time, Defendant A, as a planning document related to 3D community games, carried out back back back back back the back-line without permission, including the “PTROJEC LBT planning”, which is the trade secrets of the victim company developed for about two years, and opened the online video games to the public with the name of “project M” on the Internet game site on March 6, 2009.

As a result, Defendant A and B conspired to acquire and use trade secrets useful to the victim company for the purpose of obtaining unjust profits, and caused N to obtain the amount of accrued property benefits, and at the same time caused property damage equivalent to the same amount to the victim company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness J andO;

1. In the fifth trial records, the witness J and P's respective statements are stated 1.