A is punished by a fine of 2.5 million won, Defendant B is punished by a fine of 2.0 million won, and Defendant C is punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

[2015 High Court Decision 3194]

1. 피고인 A, B의 폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행) 피고인 A, B은 2015. 6. 19. 08:55경 서울 관악구 E에 있는 F 편의점 앞 노상에서 택시를 타기 위해 기다리다가 옆에 있던 피해자 C과 그 일행인 G이 새치기를 하였다는 이유로 다툼이 되어, 피고인 A는 피해자 C의 목을 손으로 밀치고 머리카락을 잡아당겨 넘어뜨리고, 옆에 있던 피고인 B도 가세하여 손으로 피해자의 목을 잡아 밀며 주먹으로 얼굴을 때리고 발로 정강이를 걷어찼다.

As a result, Defendant A and B assaulted Victim C jointly.

2. Defendant B’s assault and assaulted Defendant B, at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, the victim G, who was working in the line of duty and the other party C’s fighting, in his hand, sealed the victim G, who was working in the line of duty at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, and took the face of the drinking.

3. Defendant C’s assaulted Defendant C, at the time, at a place specified in paragraph (1) and at a place specified in paragraph (1), was in dispute with the victim A, and the victim’s body was tightly pushed the victim’s body while taking the victim’s bath, and the victim’s body was tightly pushed the victim’s boom, and boomed the victim’s head, thereby destroying the victim

[2015 High Court Decision 3435] Defendant A is a person driving a H P P P P PP car.

1. On July 30, 2015, Defendant A driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.086% in the section of approximately 50 meters of blood alcohol in front of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

2. Defendant A violated the Road Traffic Act, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) and at the same time, was driving the said mountain-in car in the direction of 65 degrees from the new forest to the 3-lane.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to accurately operate steering the steering direction and brake system and to safely drive it by properly examining the steering direction and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, Defendant A is negligent in neglecting this and going against his negligence.