Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the act of offering money or goods by statutes or ordinances of local governments, which is an act of performing duties not considered as a contribution act under the Public Official Election Act as stipulated in Article 112(2)4(a) or (b) of the Public Official Election Act, such as the act of offering money or goods, the interpretation of the J Lifelong Study Ordinance, the burden of proof, and the criminal intent

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.