Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Comprehensively taking account of the facts not disputed between the parties and the purport of the entire argument as to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, the fact that the defendant saw the plaintiff's title on May 14, 2010 on the distribution parking lot of Han River that is located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government distribution and distribution of Seocho-gu as his hand and shacks the plaintiff's shoulder part, etc. that was pushed back by being pushed down with the plaintiff's left arms and broken down by hand (hereinafter "the tort of this case") is recognized.

2. The plaintiff's assertion asserts that the plaintiff suffered from mental suffering as well as the damage that incurred a total of KRW 34,762,290 in the treatment costs of this case due to the tort of this case. The plaintiff sought compensation from the defendant for the remaining KRW 29,762,290 after deducting KRW 5,00,000 deposited by the defendant from the above treatment costs.

3. Determination

A. Therefore, according to the portion of the claim for medical expenses, etc. (1) the Plaintiff paid a certain amount of expenses to the hospital, pharmacy, and oriental medical clinic, etc., for the purpose of treating the tort in this case, after the tort in this case, the statement of No. 1 in the evidence of No. 23, and No. 3-1 to No. 4, are insufficient to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise. Furthermore, even though the Plaintiff paid a certain amount of expenses to the hospital, pharmacy, and oriental medical clinic, etc., for the purpose of treating the tort in this case, as well as for whether the above expenses were incurred by the tort in this case, the statement of No. 1 in the evidence of No. 1 to the effect that the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the injury to the left-hand air shoulderline, etc. requiring medical treatment for about five weeks due to the tort in this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(2) Rather, comprehensively taking account of the replys to the request for physical examination and the response to the request for physical examination and supplementation of the head of the Ansan Hospital and the purport of the entire pleadings on the response to the Seoul Hospital’s request for physical examination.