[criminal records] On April 14, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business in the Jeonju District Court’s Eup branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Jeonju prison on July 10, 2015.

[Criminal facts] 2018 Highest 189

1. On January 18, 2018, at the main point of the “E” operation of the victim D located in Mayang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-si, Annyang-gu, Annyang-si, the Defendant who interferes with his/her duties, and threatened the victim with his/her self-harm at his/her request, thereby threatening him/her as if he/she were in his/her hands.

“The sound reads “,” and read the table and table, 35 minutes of which the other customers were able to take a meal. In addition, the other customers were able to take a meal.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business.

"2018 Highest 462"

2. Larceny;

A. On March 13, 2018, from around 14:00 to around 14:30, the Defendant took advantage of the gap in the victim G management’s attention neglected between the victim’s attention, and took advantage of the gap in the victim’s G management in Ansan-gu F market, and took one factor in the market price equivalent to KRW 5,000, the victim’s market price.

B. On March 13, 2018, from around 14:00 to around 14:30, the Defendant appears to have “M” written indictment in the above F market as a clerical error in H. As such, the Defendant’s correction ex officio.

In the operation impliedly, the victim's attention has been neglected, and the victim's market price has been 2,00 won or more.

(c)

On March 13, 2018, from around 14:00 to around 14:30, the Defendant got 2 a coconssent coconuted cocons with a sum of 2,00 won in the market price owned by the victim in the above F market.

(d)

On March 13, 2018, the Defendant, at the L convenience point in the operation of the Victim K, which was displayed by an employee’s negligence in the surveillance of his employees, carried out one 1,500 won of the market price owned by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant is about 10.0% of the market price owned by the victims for four times.