2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Minister of Education, Science and Technology, through Article 208-14 of the Public Announcement of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology on August 30, 2008, publicly announced that the examination of the examination of the examination books developed under Article 2007-79 of the Public Announcement of the 2007 Amended Curriculum ( February 28, 2007) was conducted as follows (hereinafter “public announcement of the examination of the examination of this case”).

1. Subjects subject to authorization: Class 19 of a class 52-Class 2 high school curriculum: Science in the year of application of the year of authorization for the year of authorization for the development of the year of authorization for the names of essential subjects and the class 1 of a class 1 of a class of a class of curriculum among the general basic subjects or specialized subjects;

3. The period of application and the period of application for examination of places: November 2, 2009 to November 6 (gold).

8. The term of validity of the authorization for the curriculum books subject to the examination of relics shall be five years from the school year in which the relevant curriculum books are first used;

(b) The term of validity of the textbook that has passed authorization shall be the remaining term of validity of the curriculum books for the same subject, and the term of validity shall also be deemed to expire when any cause for reorganization, such as full-scale or partial revision of the curriculum

(b) spring.

Accordingly, the plaintiffs produced the main text of the High School Science Text for the examination of authorization in 2010.

C. After the public announcement of the instant authorization review, the structure of the curriculum books for elementary and secondary schools, including high school first-year science textbooks, was reorganized as prescribed in Article 2010-1 (hereinafter “instant public announcement”) of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology’s notification, and the method of adopting the curriculum books for high school was modified from the national policy and authorization system to the recognition system.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 2 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiffs asserted that they prepared an application for authorization of a high school science textbook with development cost of approximately KRW 400 million up to October 31, 2009 according to the publication of this case’s authorization authorization by the Minister of Education, Science and Technology, which announced the high school science textbook as the subject of authorization.

However, the defendant changed his own policies on January 11, 2010.