국가유공자비해당결정처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On January 1, 1982, the Plaintiff was appointed as a civilian military employee of the Mixed Flight Group under the Air Force 15, and retired from office on September 30, 2009.
B. On May 4, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on February 18, 2011, alleging that the Plaintiff had been diagnosed “satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise sate satise satise sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate satch satume sate satch satch sat.”
C. In other words, on September 16, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant on the ground that “one party knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne
In addition, on April 3, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for the re-registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State for the foregoing reasons. However, on September 1, 2015, when the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement decided to be non-applicable for re-registration on September 1, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for re-registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State again on September 16, 2015, and the Defendant.