When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the chief of the management office of the apartment management office B, the general director of the apartment building B, and the victim C.

On December 23, 2015, the Defendant attended the apartment house representative 12 and four visitors, and relays real time through broadcasting to the occupants at the Gyeyang-gu B management office around 22:00 and around December 23, 2015, the Defendant was able to have the victim appointed and deducted the lawyer.

“.....”

However, although the victim was confined to the medical institution of the government, the defendant did not appoint a lawyer.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts and false facts at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, D, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation reports and investigation reports (Submission of photographs to the representative meeting of occupants);

1. Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act (the point of defamation of false facts) against criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.