beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.09.09 2014가합50537

청구이의

Text

1. The Defendant’s notary public C with the Plaintiff on November 14, 2013 and a monetary loan agreement No. 105 signed by the Defendant on November 14, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff, who was affiliated with D from around 2010, borrowed the following money from the Defendant, and E, a certified judicial scrivener, prior to the change of Korea-NF loan loan, the Defendant, who was engaged in ordinary credit business, was the Korea-NF loan, was a social loan that was created by the Korea-NF, and was changed to the current trade name on February 25, 2014.

(hereinafter referred to as “Korea-UB”) in lending money through (hereinafter referred to as “Korea-UB”) a person who has been acting for the affairs related to registration of real estate for the security, and the defendant is a person who has lent the money to the plaintiff via E as follows:

B. The Plaintiff entered the E office on October 31, 2013 with the Plaintiff’s identification card, certificate of seal impression, and certificate of seal impression, and signed the E office on October 31, 2013 to borrow KRW 110 million from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant monetary loan agreement”).

2) The Plaintiff’s loan transaction contract, loan certificate, loan application, etc. was prepared, and the Plaintiff’s loan transaction contract, loan certificate, loan application, etc. was prepared, and the Plaintiff’s loan obligation was 392.8 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

(2) As to the real estate in this case, the Plaintiff prepared a letter of right to request the preparation of a notarial deed under the name of the Defendant, and issued a certificate of the Plaintiff’s personal seal impression.

C. On October 31, 2013, the date 1E applied for the registration of the establishment of a neighboring real estate in the instant case to the Gyeyang Registry of the Incheon District Court, which applied for the registration of the establishment of a neighboring real estate in the name of the Defendant on behalf of the Plaintiff and both of the Defendant, but the said registration office again submits a certificate of personal seal impression on the ground that the registration office is not in comparison with the certificate of personal seal impression.