beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.07.23 2014노1087

사기등

Text

The judgment below

The part against the Defendants is reversed.

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for one year imposed on Defendant A, for eight months sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant E and F, for two years of suspended execution, for two years of probation and community service order, for 120 hours of probation and community service order, for six months of suspended execution, for two years of suspended execution, for two years of probation and community service order, for 160 hours of probation and community service order is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case was committed on sales basis by Defendant A, B, C, D, and C, Defendant E, F, and veterinarian G, who is an employee in charge of Lats Insurance for the purpose of selling and buying the cattle, was laid down or laid down a lawsuit by combining the bridge of the lawsuit with ropes with ropes or wire ropes in contact with each other, and then taken the form of the lawsuit, and acquired the insurance money through a false diagnosis of the name of Byung who falls under the cause for the payment of livestock disaster insurance money. Since the moral hazard hazard of the livestock disaster insurers caused serious harm to the public trust of society, the crime was very poor in light of the size of the crime, period of the crime, method of the crime, degree of the Defendants’ respective criminal proceeds, and the crime of this case was committed by the State with the aim of increasing the income and stabilizing management of the livestock farmers, and the State’s policies with which the purpose of the insurance premium is to subsidize part of the insurance premium, and there is a serious need to punish the Defendants for severe damage to the State.

On the other hand, Defendant A was involved in acquiring approximately KRW 84,260,00 by scam, and Defendant B was involved as a joint principal offender or a joint principal offender through the instant crime in obtaining approximately KRW 36,37,00 by scambling approximately KRW 42,250,00 by scambling approximately KRW 68,90,00 by scambling the scam, Defendant B acquired approximately KRW 19,50,000 by scambling approximately KRW 68.9 million by scambling the scam.