교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On June 8, 2016, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000,000 for a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Gyeyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on March 8, 2016, the summary order of KRW 1,00,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) on August 29, 2016, and on July 21, 2017, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 for a fine due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the support for the development of the Suwon branch of the Suwon District Court.
Criminal facts
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a B B B B B B B B B car.
On February 21, 2018, the Defendant driven two or more times of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle, as above, and driven the foregoing Tbluri motor vehicle with a alcohol concentration of 0.094% in the blood, again driven the foregoing Tbluri motor vehicle at the speed of 0.094% in high-sea, and driven the road ahead of the traffic in the East Sea, which is located at the speed of 772 in the west-gu, Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, along the direction of the transformation station, along one-lanes of the three-lanes of the U.
Since signals, etc. are installed on the front door, the driver had a duty of care to reduce the speed to the person engaged in the driving duty and to prevent the accident by proceeding well with the other vehicles' attitudes in the signal lights and the front door.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not find out that the rocketing car driven by the victim C (68 tax) who was driven in the same direction as it was in the same direction without reducing the speed due to negligence while driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and did not stop according to the stop signals, and did not take the front part of the said rocketing car into account as the front part of the said rocketing car, and the said rocketing car was driven by the victim D (e.g., the 51-year-old car) who was in the atmosphere of the signal prior to being pushed by the shock, thereby getting the victim D(the 51-year-old car) of the said rocketing car to be driven by the front part of the said rocketing car.
Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence.