However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 17:25 on June 29, 2016, the Defendant engaged in a similar sexual intercourse, such as having sexual traffic female D, who was employed by the Defendant, receive KRW 80,00 from customers E to go through the hand, etc.; (b) from June 24, 2016, he/she employed the Defendant as an employee to engage in cleaning, reservation management, customer guidance, etc.; and (c) engaged in a business of arranging sexual intercourse, etc., such as having an unspecified number of men who had employed sexual traffic women D and found themselves receive money from them, and having them do a similar sexual intercourse.

2. On July 15, 2016, around 01:00, the Defendant engaged in a similar sexual intercourse, such as having sexual traffic women I receive 80,000 won from the customer J and her sexual organ hand over, etc., employed by the Defendant at the “H” sexual traffic business establishment located in Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, with the intention of engaging in a sexual intercourse, such as having sexual traffic women I receive 80,000 won from the customer J and her sexual organ hand over, etc., and having I employ sexual traffic women I during the period from July 13, 2016 to the above time, and having them receive the price from many unspecified males who sought for the sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement concerning I in a protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police officer;

1. Written statements to be prepared;

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute to each protocol of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Sexual Traffic, Articles 19 and 19 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. To the contrary, the reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, the size of business, and the absence of the same criminal record.