2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant is a taxi driver belonging to C.

On October 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 06:30 on 06:30, the Defendant sought one of the smartphones owned by the victim E (Y, 47 years old) with an owner who was found to operate a taxi from D (the age of 58) who is a private taxi driver and was found to have been using one of the smartphones owned by the victim E (the age of 47 years) with the market price of 500,000 won.

However, on October 13, 2012, the Defendant was trying to drink with the intention of taking profits from used-as sold to G (22 years of age) who is a purchaser of Masan-si bus terminal after the Masan-si bus terminal located in the synthetic Dong of Changwon-si in the Changwon-si Madon Madon Madon Madon 13, 2012.

Accordingly, the Defendant embezzled lost objects.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement D in the second police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning G;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of smartphone photographs), investigation report (Re-verification of F taxi stuff images), and investigation report (change of the name of the crime against A) (change of the name of the suspect A);

1. A reply to fact-finding by C Co., Ltd. on October 11, 2013

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to CDs (suspect A) video recording a taxi track;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

4. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of the main sentence of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or above.