When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a developer of the “B” case, a private teaching institute management program, and the victim C is a person who operates the “C Fishing Institute” in Pyeongtaek-si D.

From August 2014, the victim paid 1,00,000 won to the Defendant and 3,000,000 won per month, and used the above LP. On April 2016, the Defendant terminated the use contract by demanding the victim to increase the user fee. After paying the development cost to the program developer and requesting the development of a new operation and management program of a private teaching institute, the victim developed and used the E “E” case around May 2016.

The Defendant, in the above “E” case used by the Defendant, includes the function similar to F, which is the part of the “F,” which is the educational performance management of the instant “B” case, that was developed by the Defendant, and, on June 28, 2016, connects the Internet at the Defendant’s office located in Seoul around June 28, 2016, with access to the Defendant’s office located in Seoul, to the screen page “Ber A.

The portion "C" participating in the production of this app is proceeding with F in return for paying off costs.

A person who conducts education is in the quality of an embankment.

No reference may be made.

In search, F is needed to search F.

It is possible to know how similar is.

I would like to open a bro that informs C's Domination quality.

C will also disclose the program agreement.

“ ........”

However, in fact, the foregoing “E” case was newly developed by the victim by requesting the program developer to do so, and there was no fact that the said “B” case was deducted.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the reputation of the victim by disclosing false information through the information and communication network with a view to slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. B Education Centers.