무고교사
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.
1. The Defendants: (a) around July 10, 2009, at the F restaurant operated by the father of the small father who was located in the D of the Macheon-gu, Macheon-gu; (b) suspected that the mother who was suspected of booming the liquidation interest as a homicide during the funeral period of G funeral and who was investigated by the police as a homicide, was the offender of murdering G; (c) had the father H and the mother of the bats in the fats who was under investigation by the police; (d) fatd him as a criminal of murdering J; and (e) had the fats of the fats of the fats of the fats, without having due consideration, I submit a false complaint to the police officer that she had sexual assaulted from J; and (e) had the police officer make a false statement to the police officer that she was forced to commit indecent act by force.
Accordingly, on July 23, 2009, at the K's house located in the Net City L, Defendant B proposed that "I would have been subject to sexual indecent conduct from J, and I would have been subject to sexual indecent conduct from J, and I would have been asked to I once."
Accordingly, at around 19:00 on the following day, K met I, or G’s permanent photograph at the 19:00 on the 19:00 following day, and I asked I to find “I must do so, I must do so. I now come to see whether J would not be subject to sexual indecent act from J. I, and I reported that I met, or I was sexual indecent act from J, at the netcheon Police Station Ntation on the same day, that “I was sexual indecent act.”
On July 26, 2009, in accordance with the intent of the above Defendants’ teachers, I continued to be subject to criminal punishment by J at the Oral Safety Center of the Jeonnam-gun on July 26, 2009. In spite of the fact that he was rape or indecent act by force from J, the J did not have been subject to criminal punishment.