When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates the “E” as a manufacturer of machinery equipment and equipment located in Ansan-si.

In employing foreigners, no person shall employ any person who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment as prescribed by the Immigration Control Act.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) from Jun. 25, 2007 to Aug. 28, 2015, the Defendant: (b) from Jan. 22, 2013 to Aug. 28, 2015; (c) from Oct. 24, 2014 to Aug. 28, 2015; (d) from Oct. 10 to Aug. 28, 2015, the Defendant provided the Defendant with employment benefits of KRW 2.1 million from Aug. 6, 2015 to J from Aug. 28, 2015; and (e) from Aug. 2015 to Aug. 28, 2015, the Defendant provided the Defendant with the payment of KRW 2.1 million from Aug. 22, 2013 to Aug. 24, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute to file an accusation against an immigration offender, a written decision on review, an illegal employment statement, a business registration certificate, a certificate of foreign employment, a registered alien card, and a comprehensive record recording meeting of

1. The amount of fine like the order shall be determined by taking into account the overall circumstances such as the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and the choice of punishment under Articles 94 subparag. 9 and 18(3) of the Immigration Control Act - the process leading to this case and the defendant's attitude against the crime of this case, and the fact that there are no criminal records other than like criminal records and fines, and considering the fact that the number of foreigners employed by the defendant for a relatively large period of time is included in the number of illegal aliens employed by the defendant for a long time, and the sentencing of similar cases, etc.

1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.