However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2017 Highest 1762"

1. Around 18:40 on April 20, 2017, the Defendant driven a FM7 car in the state of under the influence of alcohol content 0.069% while under the influence of alcohol content 0.069% from the front day of a mutually influent restaurant in the Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon Metropolitan City to the front day of a restaurant located in Daejeon Daejeon Seo-gu D.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of FST7 driver cars.

On April 20, 2017, the Defendant, at around 18:40 on April 20, 2017, proceeded at the speed of 1 lane in front of the E cafeteria in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, at the right speed from the parallel of the west to the direction of the mountain.

Since the place is one lane, in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to see the front door well and to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, as seen above, Defendant 1 did not breath the front part of Defendant 1’s driving vehicle, and did not discover the H-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of two weeks’ medical treatment, to the victim I (V, 55 years old) who was on board the victim G and the damaged vehicle due to such occupational negligence.

On April 20, 2017, the Defendant, at around 18:40 on April 20, 2017, was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.069% in blood on the road in front of the E cafeteria located in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, while driving a FM7 car, the lower part of the FM7 car in the HM7 test was not driven out of the vehicle.

The defendant was asked by K as to whether a police officer belonging to the J District, who was dispatched after receiving the above report, has driven alcohol, and the above K has been changed.