The judgment of the court below on the defendant's punishment of 70,000 won is too unreasonable.2.2.

The Defendant recognized the instant crime, and the victim also submitted a written application to the effect that he would take the Defendant’s prior action at the lower court.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant has the history of fine, the place where the defendant assaulted the victim is the court-petition and the public service center, and the degree of the victim's injury, the circumstance or result is not easy, and the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order seems to have been reduced due to the consideration of the circumstances that the defendant has already asserted in the court below, and other various sentencing conditions in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, and circumstances after the crime, are considered as being too unreasonable. Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The right to create a judge (Presiding Judge) shall be non-permanentized