However, the above sentence shall be executed for four years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. At around January 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had the intent to have sexual intercourse with the victim E (the age of 45) who works for entertainment workers in the “Dju shop” room 3 at regular Eup/Eup/Myeon Office C (hereinafter “Dju store”) in order for the victim E (the age of 45) to have been forced to have sexual intercourse with the victim who was seated next.

The Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant was “not an important thing to drink and singing; (b)” that the Defendant reads the victim as a wall, and carried the victim’s head and face with the victim several times; (c) prevented the victim from resisting the victim’s face and face by hand; (d) attempted to talk with the victim’s chest and part of the victim, walking the victim’s body and walking the victim, and rape the victim; (c) attempted to commit rape; (d) the victim, “I am flick and flick;” and (d) attempted to flee out of the room, and did not achieve the intent.

Then, the Defendant, after having taken the victim's face from drinking to drinking, had the victim go beyond the floor when taking care of the victim's face, had the victim walked, and had the victim walked several times, and caused the victim's injury, such as the complete escape of about four weeks in need of medical treatment, humphe, tension, etc.

2. The Defendant purchased drinking water at the convenience point of “I” located in the above H while requesting the accompanying from G, etc. of the affiliated districts of the Si/Eup/Myeon Police Station F District, who was dispatched to the site upon receiving a report on the facts constituting the crime stated in paragraph (1) at the time and place of the performance of official duties.

At around 20:27 on the same day, the Defendant, in front of the above convenience store, took the head of the above G by using plastic drinking water bottle, which was cited by the Defendant, “Ye, Chewing flag, flag, flag, flag,” and her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. Each police statement made to J;

1. G. G.