However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

B is an employee of corporation C, and the defendant is a director in the name of corporation D, E is an operator of corporation D, and F is a loan hub.

Defendant, B, E, and F concluded a contract for the lease of facilities (lease) with D Co., Ltd. as lessee by pretending to purchase machinery, such as flass and cutting machines from C, with which C Co., Ltd. as lessee, and C Co., Ltd. received the payment of the said machinery from the injured party and raised funds to use it as operating funds by receiving the payment of the machinery from C.

The Defendant and E purchased machinery, such as flass and cutting machines (hereinafter “instant machinery”) from D Co., Ltd., Ltd., in the office of D Co., Ltd., Ltd., the victim G, at early 2014, from C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant machinery”).

The contract was concluded for facility leasing (lease) with D as a lessee with the instant machine as the object of lease, making D as a lessee.

B around the 16th day of the same month, I submitted an order acceptance, tax invoice, and estimate forged in the name of C in the name of C at the office of C of the J building K at Silsi, and F entered into an agreement to repurchase the instant machinery in the name of C in the name of C or C by deceiving C to I under the name of the representative director L of C or C at the time of the same day, and submitting to C an agreement to repurchase any forged material, a copy of the board of directors, a personal (credit), a written consent, and a written consent to collect and use the personal (credit) information, and upon default of debt, C delivers the instant machinery to D by deceiving as if C would purchase the instant machinery, and D would not pay rent to the victim.

However, the facts are that D did not purchase the instant machinery from C.