If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Defendant

A is a person who has operated a mechanical manufacturing plant.

On February 12, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received the delegation of enforcement from the enforcement officer B, who is the creditor, by the enforcement officer B of the judgment of the above court on the provisional seizure of movable properties owned by the Defendant; (b) by the executing officer B, who is the creditor, seized the movable properties owned by the Defendant at the market price of 6,970,00 won at 35 points, including 2,00,000, among the movable properties owned by the Defendant; and (c) made the indication of the seizure, despite the fact that the seizure was made on April 3, 2019 from the date of the above seizure, at the place where the above seizure was held on April 3, 2019, for the purpose of making it difficult to identify the list No. 1, No. 7 Moz (including fili, ppuri) and No. 2 of the Warline (including attached sets) among the seized properties, thereby harming the use of the indication by the public official as to its duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on attachment of corporeal movables, a seizure list, and a report on inspection of seized objects

1. Relevant Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;